CL Solutions’ Canadian Partner Featured for Cleantech Oil and Gas Sector Services

Delta Remediation of Acheson, Alberta, Canada is featured in the Canadian Trade Commissioner Service as a leader in clean technologies for the oil and gas industry in Canada and internationally.  Delta Remediation uses a proprietary blend of CL Solutions’ organisms called Biologix for bioremediaion of hydrocarbons in soil, water and ground water.  Download information about Delta Remediation and Canada’s cleantech industries by clicking here.  Learn more about Delta Remediation by clicking here to go to their web site. 

 

 

Oil-Contaminated Water Treatment

CL Solutions provides a special consortium of microbes for remediation of water containing high concentrations of used or waste oil.  Under various conditions, the oil removal rate was as much as 1,300 mg/L/day.  In some situations the remediation goal is simply to remove the visible sheen or separate-phase oil.  With aeration, CL Solutions microbes were able to remove the visible oil layer and reduce the TPH concentration from 29% to less than 1% in 30 days at a waste oil lagoon. For more information and other case studies click here.

A special consortium of microbes removed the visible oil layer from this wastewater.

Bioremediation With Horizontal Injection for BTEX and Naphthalene Remediation

In situ remediation is a contact sport, requiring contact between the microbes and contamination.  Clay-rich soils are particularly challenging as the low permeability limits effective distribution of inoculants.  While numerous closely-spaced injection points can improve the distribution of inoculants, this approach is often not possible at active properties and can be costly.  Horizontal drilling was used on the subject site to overcome the combined challenges of low permeability and limited site access to inject Petrox® microbes for bioaugmentation.  The combined technologies reduced the total BTEX concentrations in ground water from 2,771 µg/L to 645 µg/L in less than one year.

Background

The site is a former gas station located in the Florida panhandle.  The site soils are mixed silt and clayey silts that are typical of the coastal setting.  The depth to the water table varied seasonally from 13 to 18 below ground surface.

The underground storage tanks and contaminated soil had been removed prior to the ground water treatment.  Residual ground water contamination exceeded Florida Ground Water Cleanup Target Levels (GCTLs) for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, naphthalene and methylnaphthalene isomers.

The proposed treatment area was approximately 2,500 square feet.  The treatment depth was from 10 to 25 feet below grade.  The treatment depth included the capillary fringe to treat residual contamination above the seasonal low water table.

Horizontal Injection

 Access to the treatment area was limited by the current property use, the proximity of roads on two sides and a building on the third.  Horizontal drilling was selected by the site consultant, Advanced Environmental Technologies (www.aetllc.com) to deliver Petrox® to the contamination.

The horizontal drill rig was set back from the treatment zone on the opposite side of the building.  The horizontal injection wells were set in four horizontal sets of eight wells. The horizontal layers were at 10, 15, 20 and 25 feet deep.  The wells in each layer were five feet apart.  A total of 32 injection wells were closely spaces for excellent coverage through the treatment zone.

Petrox® was injected into the ground water in two treatment events – November 6, 2008 and June 24, 2009.  Petrox® was delivered in each injection well as the drill stem was withdrawn through the treatment zone.  The injection was monitored for accuracy so that 0.2 gallons of Petrox® was injected per foot of injection zone.  A total of 320 gallons of Petrox® slurry was injected.

Following the Petrox® injection, air was injected periodically through vertical sparging wells to increase the oxygen availability for the microbial metabolism.

Results

Ground water samples were collected from a monitoring well inside the treatment area to track the progress of the bioremediation.  Approximately 60 days after the first Petrox® treatment, analysis of ground water samples showed 84% reduction in the benzene concentration and 35% reduction in the total BTEX compounds concentrations.  There was an apparent increase in the xylene concentration due to ground water mixing and induced increase in solubility due to the bioaugmentation injections.

A second sampling event approximately 30 days after the second injection showed additional reduction in the contaminant concentrations.  After the second injection, the total BTEX concentrations were 23% of the original concentration with xylene decreasing from 1,200 to 95 µg/L.

In addition to the BTEX compounds, naphthalene and methylnaphthalene isomer concentrations decreased through both treatments.

  Sampling Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene Naphthalene
Pre-treatment 11/11/05 3,000 42 1,100 1,100 230
10/23/08 1,700 18 460 454 280
11/6/08 1,600 41 370 760 310
Post-treatment

 

1/22/09 420 43 140 1,200 43
7/30/09 490 2.6 57 95 55

Conclusions

Horizontal drilling and injection made it possible to remediate ground water at this site of petroleum contamination with limited access and low natural permeability.  Without disturbing the property use, the horizontal injection of Petrox® provided effective distribution of the microbes for bioremediation.  The injection may have also made the contamination more available for bioremediation by increasing the contaminant solubility as shown by temporary increases in concentration.

This case study demonstrates that in situ bioaugmentation may be a feasible solution for sites with limited permeability and access restrictions.  For more information contact CL Solutions at www.cl-solutions.com.

BTEX and Naphthalene Bioremediation to BDL by Petrox Microbes

Case Study:
Orange County Fire and Rescue Station 81, Orlando, Florida

Oculus Number 8520434

Petrox was used to treat the residual petroleum contamination in ground water after the leaking tank was removed.  The petroleum contamination exceeded applicable standards for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) and naphthalene.  Petrox was injected into the ground water through 28 injection points covering a plume area of approximately 6,300 square feet.   Petrox injections were completed on June 18, September 11, and November 1, 2002.

Prior to bioaugmentation 100 pounds of ORC was added to provide supplemental oxygen for the bioremediation.  After verifying the dissolved oxygen concentration was more than 1.0 mg/l, the site was ready for bioaugmentation.

During the first injection 10 drums of Petrox were injected to cover the full plume.  As the area of contamination decreased, less Petrox was injected.  Five drums were injected in a focused application on September 11 and November 1, 2002.

Quarterly monitoring was completed during and after the inoculation to determine the bioremediation results.  The cleanup goals were achieved in the source area after the first inoculation.  The contamination persisted, however, in the down gradient wells.  The cleanup goals were achieved in the down gradient monitoring well after the third injection, but there was subsequent rebound.  After full distribution of Petrox was reached throughout the plume, the BTEX and naphthalene concentration were below detection limits (BDL), and cleanup goals were achieved and maintained. 

Please refer to the table below for the ground water monitoring results.

Monitoring Well Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Naphthalene
MW-7 Source Area 6/12/2000 5.0 46.0 18.0 90.0 24.0
6/13/2001 39.0 272.0 167.0 526.0 26.0
3/14/2002 21.0 19.0 102.0 266.0 39.0
6/5/2002 ORC Added
6/18/02 10 Drums of Petrox Added
7/14/2002 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0
9/11/2002 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0
9/11/02 5 Drums of Petrox Added
10/7/2002 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0
11/1/02 5 Drums of Petrox Added
12/2/2002 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0
1/9/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <5.0
4/17/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0
             
MW-8

Down Gradient

6/12/2000 2.0 72.0 21.0 109.0 39.0
6/13/2001 14.8 677.0 207.0 1292.0 113.0
3/14/2002 71.0 1198.0 357.0 2408.0 193.0
6/5/2002 ORC Added
6/18/02 10 Drums of Petrox Added
7/15/2002 19.0 515.0 170.0 690.0 39.0
9/11/2002 <1.0 3.7 3.8 16.4 <1.0
9/11/02 5 Drums of Petrox Added
10/7/2002 6.4 2.3 4.7 23.8 15.0
11/1/02 5 Drums of Petrox Added
12/2/2002 38.0 515.0 95.0 460.0 10.0
1/9/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <5.0
4/17/2003 <110.0 1060.0 285.0 1120.0 65.0
4/29/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/1/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/1/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3/21/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

Pesticide Bioremediation – Landfarming Application for DDD, DDE and Toxaphene

Petrox® bioremediation was used to remediate pesticide-contaminated soil at an industrial location in California.

Soil Remediation

The soil contamination consisted of pesticides including 4,4-DDD, 4’4-DDE and toxaphene.  Soil samples were sent to CL Solutions for bench-scale treatability studies.   The following table shows the  maximum detected concentrations and the treatment results.

Contaminant
Untreated Concentrations (ug/Kg)
Post-treatment concentrations (ug/Kg)
4,4-DDD
390
250
4,4-DDE
380
220
Toxaphene
8,500
440

After the bench-scale verification, full-scale bioremediation was implemented.  The contaminated soil was placed in two stockpiles and treated with Petrox. The following table shows the pre- and post-treatment results.

Contaminant Concentrations (ug/Kg)
Contaminant
Pile 1
Pile 2
Before
After
Before
After
4,4-DDD
310
170
14
nd ( <5)
4,4-DDE
810
300
8.7
nd  (<5)
Toxaphene
12,000
7,300
380
nd (<5)

Conclusions

The Petrox treatment successfully reduced the concentrations of pesticide contaminants in the soil stockpiles.  For additional information or assessment of applicability to your site contact CL Solutions.